The most spectacular spectacle in the political life of Poland is approaching, and it is the May elections for the president of the country. The current president id Andrzej Duda, who has been in this office since 2015.

Elections to the authorities in Poland have always surprised me. Just before the election, candidates are picked up like from a magic hat, which no one else had heard of before but the narrow circle of party members. There is no custom in Poland for socially engaged people to conduct publications in the form of blogs so that you can get to know the views of candidates and their intellectual preparation to lead the nation. Even the activity of people already performing political functions is limited to one-sentence statements in infantile messengers (social media). IS Polish politicians capable of such intellectual effort? It is amazing that such people gain a strong electoral electorate in Poles and I can’t get over why they choose their leaders?

It was no different in the case of the current president, who was elected by the Polish nation at the same time as a mockery. The President of Poland Andrzej Duda is a disgrace to this country, he is a man weak authority, deprived of the ability to think independently, so is it not strange why Poles choose such clowns for such representative position, from which they later scoff? Is this supposed to involve the president?

There is a supposition that the reason for this is the lack of knowledge about candidates before the election and the strong belief that absenteeism is unlawful (formerly you could be arrested for not being present at the election), and the belief that such an attitude adversely affects the country’s policy, because hostile political forces are taking advantage of the lack or our voice against us. That is why people in a sense of forced duty vote thoughtlessly not on personalities but on names based on electoral marketing.

The second reason closer to the customer of electoral intelligence is the belief tat governments in the country exercise political lobbying in the from of party groups and the position of their representative in this case as president is purely arbitrary. The chosen person is completely irrelevant, but the political grouping from which the person originates and issues directives to the president is important. It looks like party lobbing would employ votes with its candidate for the highest office in the state. So the president in Poland is not a representative of the interests of the Polish nation but the leading party.

In the face of such a situation, participation in the presidential election does not make any practical sense, and the low election absence at the border of 40% should suggest international opinion that the election in the country is not important because there is no suitable candidate representing the interests of citizens, so the current position of the president should be revoked. You can even quickly conclude that such a position is an unnecessary burden on the budget. Any country can operate freely without a king and without a president and it is certainly a healthier approach than to appoint a random sly, tyrant, or a jester fooled by some party. (Brux)

…………………
BRUXnews
RSS subscription: https://brux.news.blog/feed/
Editor contact: BRUXnews@post.com