The gas company PGNiG extorts money from customers. Polish courts help.

Polish law allows for institutional fraud against clients. This is happening with the full approval and assistance of Polish courts. Let’s see how it works in one of the many cases, and I will try to describe them one by one in the following texts.

Poland is a country that relies heavily on natural gas in terms of consumption. The main distributor and supplier of Natural Gas in Poslka is the monopoly company PGNiG. In Poland, hardly anyone cooks dinners on electricity, because houses are equipped with gas installations. Lack of competition results in impunity for the policy towards clients. Any form of customer objection to PGNiG’s policy will result in the gas supply being cut off. Some situations require the customer to take gas during the conflict with the monopoly. In such a situation, the construction of the law in Poland protects the monopolist, treating illegal gas consumption, regardless of the circumstances, as a high-class crime of theft.

And this is where the Polish reality begins, because it is very difficult to pay for illegal gas consumption. It is consumption that is not added to the customer’s bill and is not subject to debt vindication of the gas supplier. It is counted separately and treated as the arrears to the claim by the court. At the same time, the monopoly of PGNiG charges a higher rate here, which should already be contrary to the regulations and usually a long, sometimes several years delay with the application for court proceedings. Ta zwłoka to gra na odsetki.

The lawsuit itself is also interesting, in the event that an illegal gas collector, during the delay of the monopoly, has sold an apartment and settled with the supplier for the gas covered by the contract, PGNiG files an application to the court for a claim, but gives the address of the gas collection point, not the current address of the debtor. Polish courts have such a criminal practice that they do not analyze the correctness of addressing the subpoena. The court may send information about a pending case to any address conceived by the defendant and consider the parcel delivered. It is convenient for the court, because when the accused is not present at the trial, the court quickly adjudicates on his guilt, although he may be innocent, but in Polish courts it is not about justice that is a victory for the institution.
This is the Polish law which is a criminal monopoly.

In order for PGNiG to win the lawsuit against debtors, the gas company monitors which addresses are no longer valid and then takes the case to court.

After winning the case, PGNiG waits with the bailiff’s execution. Only before the limitation period does he ask for debt enforcement. This is a practice that aims to maximize the value of your debt. One can clearly feel the abuse of legal privileges, which were created for this purpose as legal provisions in Poland. It is not possible to change these unfair regulations, as the legal lobby is doing everything to ensure that this state of extortion in Poland is preserved.

To confirm the credibility of this act of violence, I give the names. The monopoly in the court was represented by Anna Zielińska, at the request of Adam Miller, Sociable court officials Mariusz Bilicza, Marcin Sychowicz, Malgorzata Lach (District Court in Lodz). (Brux)

…………………
BRUXnews
RSS subscription: https://brux.news.blog/feed/
Editor contact: BRUXnews@post.com